Supplement Reviews | Fat Burners & Weight Loss | Bodybuilding Guides | Training & Fitness | Health & Nutrition | Fitness Tracker | User Reviews | Forums

Creatine monohydrate info.
  Creatine benefits
  Creatine side effects
  Creatine use and cycling
  Creatine serum vs. powder
 
Creatine Monohydrate FAQ
  Creatine Monohydrate FAQ 2
  Creatine and Health 1
  Creatine and Health 2
  EAS Betagen Review
  Homemade Celltech Phosphagen
  Kre Alkalyn Creatine Review
  Muscletech Aplodan Review
  MuscleTech Cell Tech Review
  MuscleTech CellTech Review 2
  NO Xplode Creatine Review - BSN
  Nutrex Vitargo CGL Creatine
  San V12 Turbo Review
  Universal Animal Pump Review - 1
  Universal Animal Pump Review - 2
  Xyience NOX-CG3 Review

100% Whey Protein Review
  100% Egg Protein Review
  Anator P70 Review
  Cytosport Muscle Milk Review
  Cytosport Cytogainer Review
  Designer Whey Protein Review
  Designer Whey Premium Isolate
  Designer Protein Review
  Dymatize Elite Whey Protein
  Egg Protein - Egg White Protein
  Heavy Weight Gainer 900
  Methoxy Pro Supplement Review
  MuscleTech Nitro Tech Review
  Osmo Build Fast Protein Review
  Whey Protein Compared - 1
  Whey Protein Compared - 2
  Protein Supplement Showdown - 1
  Whey Concentrate Showdown - 2
  Whey Isolate Showdown - 3
  Protein Blends Showdown - 4
  Other Proteins Showdown - 5
  Pinnacle Juiced Protein Review
  Pro Complex Protein Review
  Prolab N-Large 2 Review
  Protein Myth 1
  Protein Myths 2
  PVL Whey Gourmet Review
  Sci Fit Econo Whey Protein Review
  Soy Protein Supplements
  Soy Protein Isolate Info
  Soy Protein Benefits
  Stallone Instone Pudding Review
  Syntrax Nectar Protein Drink
  Whey protein information
  Whey isolate & concentrate
  Whey protein side effects
  Whey comparison guide
  Whey Protein and Cancer Benefits
  Whey Protein - More Info 1
  Whey Protein - More Info 2
  Whey Protein Process Method - 1
  Whey Protein Process Method - 2

Best Protein Bars Compared
  Chef Jay's Tri-O-Plex Bar
  Clif Energy Bar Review
  Designer Whey U Turn Bar Review
  Detour Bar Review
  Luna Bar Review
  Power Bar Review
  Power Bar Harvest Review
  Power Bar Protein Plus Review
  Power Bars Compared
  Promax Energy Bar Review
  Protein Bar & Nutrition Bars
  Protein Bars Review Guide

Meal Replacements Compared 1
  Meal Replacements Compared 2
  Meal Replacements Compared 3
  Meal Replacements Compared 4
  Meal MRP Replacements Guide
  EAS Myoplex MRP Review
  IIsopure MRP Review
  Lean Body MRP Review
  Lean Mass Complex Review
  Met Rx MRP Review
  Met Rx Products
  MuscleTech MesoTech Review

6 OXO Review
  Animal Pak Review
  Animal Stak Review
  Alpha Lipoic Acid Info
  ABB Carbo Force Energy Drink
  Accelerade Sports Drink
  Bodybuiding Supplements 1
  Bodybuiding Supplements 2
  BSN Endorush Review - 1
  BSN Endorush Review - 2
  BSN Supplement Stack - 1
  BSN Cell Mass Review - 2
  BSN True Mass Review - 3
  BSN Axis HT Review - 4
  BSN Syntha 6 Review -5
  BSN Nutrition Conclusion - 6
  BSN Nitrix Review
  Branched Chain Amino Acids
  Chrysin Supplement Information
  CoEnzyme Q10 - CoQ10 Info
  Cytosport Cytomax Sports Drink
  Diesel Energy Stix
  Dymetadrine Xtreme Review
  Endurox R4 Carbohydrate Drink
  Ergopharm 1 AD Prohormone
  Ergopharm 1 AD Side Effects
  Flax Seed Oil Health Benefits
  GABA Supplement Information
  Ginkgo Biloba Information
  HMB Supplement - EAS HMB
  Horny Goat Weed Information
  Instone Forza T Review
  L-Glutamine information
  MHP T-Bomb II Review
  Glutamine Side Effects
  Glucosamine Chondroitin
  Muscletech Gakic Review
  Muscletech Leukic Review - 1
  Muscletech Leukic Review - 2
  Muscletech Leukic Review - 3
  Nutrex Vitrix Review
  NO2 Supplement Review
  Palo Alto Lab Paravol
  Pinnacle NoX2 Review
  Ribose Supplements Review
  Ribose & Creatine Stack
  Saw Palmetto Herb Extract
  Steel Libido for Men Review - 1
  Steel Libido for Women Review - 2
  Taurin Supplement Information
  Tongkat Ali Supplement
  Tribulus Terrestris Facts & Info
  Tribulus Side Effects & Stack
  Ultimate Orange Drink Review
  Xyience Xenergy Review
  ZMA Z Mass PM, Cyclo Zmass
  Coral Calcium Supplement
  Yohimbe Bark Extract Info

Biotest Hot Rox Review
  Hoodia Gordonii Diet Pill Review
  Hoodia Gordonii Diet Pill Guide - 1
  Hoodia 750 & Hoodia Dex L10 - 2
  Desert Burn Hoodia Review - 3
  Hoodoba Pure Review - 4
  Hydroxycut Hardcore Review
  Hydroxycut Max for Women
  Hydroxycut Review
  Instone LeanFire Review
  Lean System 7 Review
  Lipoderm Ultra Review
  Nutrex Lipo 6 Review
  Relacore Review
  Tonalin CLA Supplement
  Trimspa Ephedra Free Review
  VPX Meltdown Review
  VPX Redline Review
  Wu Yi Tea Review
  New Xenadrine RFA-1 Review
  Xenadrine EFX Review
  Zantrex 3 Review

 

Nutrex Vitargo CGL Review

Vitargo CGL Creatine

I'm sure you've probably heard of the terms creatine transport and insulin spike - all associated with creatine / carbohydrate transport supplements such as Cell Tech, EAS Phosphagen, AST Creatine HSC, and many other similar creatine and carbohydrate (dextrose) type of products on the market today.

But you may not be familiar with terms such as "osmolality rate" used in promoting Nutrex Vitargo CGL advantages over other creatine & dextrose supplements. This has something to do with the type of carbohydrate and its molecular weight which extends various benefits to transporting creatine within your body.

Vitargo CGL Nutrition Facts:
Serving Size (scoop) 2
Servings Per 22
Calories 287
Fat Calories 0
Creatine Monohydrate 10g
Cholesterol (mg) 0
Sodium (mg) 100
Potassium (mg) 150
Total Carbs (g) 70
Sugars (g) 0
Proteins (g) 0
Magnesium (mg) 50
Phosphorous (mg) 200
*Vitargo (g) 70

Ingredient Details:
*Vitargo (patented sugar-free high molecular weight carbohydrate from Swedish maxy maize starch), pure grade creatine monohydrate, natural and artificial flavors, citric acid, osmosis balancing electrolytes, silicon dioxide, sucralose, FD&C red 40.

Nutrex Vitargo CGL Creatine - What's the Difference?

Looking at the above ingredient list for Vitargo CGL, the basics of it are like any other creatine transport supplement - 70g of carbohydrate and 10g of creatine monohydrate. So what's the big deal you ask? Well let's just compare it to cell tech for a second:

Cell-Tech Hardcore: 75g dextrose (carbohydrate) & 10g creatine
Vitargo CGL: 70g carbohydrates & 10g creatine

Hmmm... not much difference other than 5 gram of carbohydrates. Well, not so. There's a big difference in the carbohydrates used in Vitargo CGL compared to other carbohydrate/creatine products. It uses a "high molecular weight carbohydrate" which Nutrex calls "Vitargo" that claims to have low osmolality rate while high GI carbs like dextrose and maltodextrin has high osmolality rate.

What does that all mean?

Osmolality simply means the concentration of particles in a solution. This is probably not the most scientific definition, but most of the scientific definitions are barely understandable. A solution that has a low osmolality than blood is referred to as being Hypotonic, which means that a low osmolality solution passes through the stomach faster as compared to a high osmolality solution.

So what's all this talk about the high molecular weight carbohydrate (Vitargo)?

Vitargo, a "high molecular weight carbohydrate", has a molecular weight of around 500,000 to 700,000. While dextrose has a molecular weight of about 180, and maltodextrin has a molecular weight of about 1,000 to 10,000. The lower the molecular weight a carbohydrate has, the higher osmolality it has. So by having a much higher molecular weight, Vitargo has a much lower osmolality, making it pass through the stomach faster than dextrose or maltodextrin. Simple enough, right?

Okay, so with all this talk about molecular weight, and osmolality, where's the scientific evidence to back it all up?

Vitargo CGL Studies

Improved gastric emptying rate in humans of a unique glucose polymer with gel-forming properties.
Leiper JB, Aulin KP, Söderlund K.
Dept. of Biomedical Sciences, Aberdeen University, UK.

This study looked at the rate of gastric emptying of two isoenergetic carbohydrate solutions with different osmolality. 6 healthy males were studied on 2 occasions using 550ml solution containing 13.5% carbohydrate named "G-Drink" and "C-Drink", where the C-Drink was hypotonoic with low osmolality (like Vitargo).

The study found that the half emptying time for the C-drink (hypotonic) was faster than the G-Drink. They also found that the amount of carbohydrates delivered to the small intestine was greater during the first 10 min after ingestion of C-drink compared to the G-Drink.

They concluded that the carbohydrates in C-drink, although has the tendency to form a gel, empties from the stomach faster than the G-drink.

Muscle glycogen resynthesis rate in humans after supplementation of drinks containing carbohydrates with low and high molecular masses.
Piehl Aulin K, Söderlund K, Hultman E.
Department of Medical Sciences, University of Uppsala/LIVI, S-791 88 Falun, Sweden.

This study looked at the rate of muscle glycogen synthesis during 2 and 4 hours of recovery after depletion by exercise using two energy equivalent carbohydrate drinks. the C-drink has a molecular mass of 500000 to 700000 (just like Vitargo) with osmolality of 84, and the G-drink has a molecular mass of about 500 with osmolality of 350.

13 healthy and well trained men took the drinks after glycogen depleting exercise - one drink at each test occasion. Total carbohydrates consumed was 300g given in 75g doses in 4 settings - immediately after exercise, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, and 90 minutes after exercise. Blood glucose and insulin concentrations were recorded every 30 minutes of the 4 hour recovery period.

The study found that the glycogen synthesis rate was significantly higher during the initial 2 hours for the C-drink (vitargo) compared to the G drink, leading to the conclusion that osmolality of the carbohydrate drink may influence the rate of resynthesis of glycogen in muscle after its depletion by exercise.

Nutrex Vitargo CGL - My Review

Having finished my fruit punch flavored Vitargo CGL, I have to say that its effects are more noticeable compared to other dextrose / maltodextrin based creatine delivery supplements. We've received numerous user reviews of Vitargo, you can read them there, or share your own experiences as well. The user feedback are overwhelmingly positive, giving Vitargo a very high overall rating.

I found that the mixed solution tends to be somewhat slimy, almost gel like, just as the studies above mentioned, it tends to get gel-like. I highly recommend following the bottle instructions, and shake your mix vigorously for a minute or so. I didn't shake it so well my first time, and by the time I finished drinking it, there was a thick layer of settled "gel" at the bottom of the shaker cup - lesson learned!

Tastewise, I've only tried the fruit punch flavor. While it's not an exceptionally tasty mix, it's quite decent. Following the powder to water proportions recommended by the container, it turns out to be a light tasting drink mix.

 

Pete Sisco's Maximum Strength


Pete Sisco is the developer of Power Factor Training and Static Contraction Training - over 200,000 people worldwide have trained using Pete's methods.

In just 10 weeks of Static Contraction training, trainees (hardcore bodybuilders who had been lifting "heavy" for a long time and averaged 38years old) achieved the following average gains:

  • 51.3% increase static strength
  • 27.6% increase in one-rep max in full range of motion! (without doing full range lifts for 10 weeks!)
pete sisco static contraction training
  • 34.3% increase in ten-rep max in full range of motion! (see above)
  • gained 9.0 pounds of new muscle (one subject gained 29 pounds of muscle!)
  • gained 1/2 inch on each biceps, 1.1 inches on chest, and 1.2 inches on shoulders
  • lost 4.9 pounds of fat & lost 0.4 inches on waist

Have you had size and strength gains like the above in the last 10 weeks? With Pete's no-nonsense, scientific approach to bodybuilding and strength training you can achieve your goals and go beyond.

>> Click here for Pete Sisco's Maximum Strength Program <<